Nslookup works but can t ping. The "/etc/resolv.

Nslookup works but can t ping. I have solved this when I remove the "localhost" (127. I'd check to see which DNS they're using. Run it in interactive mode and supply the DNS server’s IP address: nslookup - Beyond those two tests, I’ll second rpopa’s advice and suggest checking the firewall/router access rules and make sure that it isn’t restricting traffic from the DMZ server to the DNS server. can ping host but nslookup can't resolve. If I do a ping -a ipaddress. It is part of libc, and man nsswitch. The client has not registered itself in DNS. $ nslookup thisdomainsurelydoesntexist. Expected Behaviour: After adding the pihole ip as the DNS on my Windows machine then hosts should still resolve and be reachable via a browser. I had the same problem on my installation. 3. My issue is that I can ping / telnet port 53 fine from the outside world, and I can nslookup fine from inside the network, but I can't nslookup from outside. Laptop is connected to our company VPN (Juniper Network Connect 7. local: Non-existent domain. You also need to include a '. I can nslookup the hostname of the third machine fine. DnsServer. Networking. avahi: ping can't resolve hostname, but nslookup can. From that laptop, while connected, nslookup polls the correct DNS server, returns the right IP. local can't find vm1host. Specifically, nslookup only uses the first DNS server configured for the NIC (by default). 3#53 ** server can't find thisdomainsurelydoesntexist. com, domain2. If you run host -v api. I know A records exist for the hosts I'm checking against so I expect 'nslookup SomeHost. Most other software uses it. What Why is 'ping' unable to resolve a name when 'nslookup' works fine? (24 answers) Closed 8 years ago. Problem started after the creators update, users couldn’t access their mapped drives once connected to the VPN - we shortly found that the client device could nslookup the nslookup and ping don’t use the same mechanisms to resolve host names. com'. tracert will show you this. nslookup specifically issues DNS requests; by default, it contacts the name servers configured nslookup does not use NRPT. Say, mDNS (Multicast DNS) service shipped with Ubuntu 18. conf. The DNS resolves when using nslookup but When PING doesn't work, the tracert doesn't work either. To do so, run a command prompt, It cannot ping other internal hosts by their hostname or FQDN. The whole issue revolves around the fact that the vendor software checks to see the target is alive before allowing connection, and I’m assuming it uses ping method because it gives a warning it can’t reach the target host and won’t let you connect. I can ping the DNS servers (by IP address). I tested nslookup and the DNS entry is there. You can check the DNS servers, and their precedence, by drilling into the properties of the network adaptor. How can I make ping work for the Windows Flush DNS, reset Winsock and reset TCP/IP. I tried RootkitRevealer but it showed nothing untoward. hole Address: 192. com' to return an IP address. From the Internet archive, the short answer was: edit /etc/nsswitch. (This is actually occurring on OS/X, and I see other threads on this same problem elsewhere. The strange thing is certain tools like nslookup or host resolve to the correct IP, but other tools like ssh, ping, git, and web browsers do not. But I can't access the OWA with my browser. host and nslookup make several separate DNS queries – one for each record type. We had an issue similar to this on 2 systems and it turned our to be something wrong with our Forticlient Software combined with a conflict between fortclient and Malwarebytes (during the free trial of the premium webscanning console) I uninstalled Malwarebytes, and Forticlient, reinstalled Forticlient and the problem was resolved on one system, the other nslookup works fine; dig works fine; ping only works with ip address, not with domains; wget and curl also fail to resolve /etc/resolv. They want to show you both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, so they need to make an A query and an AAAA query. it returns the name of the host and pings it successfully. When pinging this IP, it actually works. from there I can ping and curl just fine; dig / nslookup cannot resolve, but ping can. Nslookup works fine because it skips the local resolver. Pihole is installed on a Raspberry PI A+ that is connected to the network via a usb (gadget mode). my topology is like this : Router - Cisco C2960-X (Vlan 1 & 100) - VM Host > Internet Connected to Vlan1 - and from Vlan1 to Router (port1) : WAN > VM Host Connected to Vlan100 - and from Vlan100 to Router (port4) : LAN gateway >>the switc Hello together, after I set up a new split tunnel VPN on an Cisco ASA Firewall for our remote users they are able to reach the internet and our internal resources but only via IP address. and verify that it works. However nslookup command is working and displays the proper internal dns server but pinging is not working (only when I add The same argument goes for ping -a. It seems any function that The problem comes with the client machines, the client is set to use the dns server (in this case 192. 1. tracert vm1host. But when I tried to ping domain names, e. I just had the same issue on my Windows 10 laptop. com, it always return ping: bad address 'google. local: Ping request could not find host vm1host. 10 nameserver 1. This did not help. Sometimes, when trying to run the nslookup command, they encounter this; however This is a good example for why an answer should not just be a link, seeing as that domain is now offline. 125. com returns an IP. com: NXDOMAIN If my ISP were deliberately redirecting me, then nslookup should work the same as ping, shouldn't it? That they don't tells me it's my own configuration issue. AI features where you work: search, IDE, and chat. 50#53 Name: ve4edj. x/24 and the domain is contoso. 1) which was listed as forwarder in my DNS configuration of Mac OS X server. 21 My problem is that no other program seems to be able to lookup the DNS name: hawk:~ user$ ping publicwebserver. You can also list them using. com DnsServer. nameserver 192. in-addr. com doesn't work, returning Ping request could not find host google. local >Server: 192. Teams. It isn't enough to simply point at the correct authoritative name server. I also disabled NetBIOS over GPO in the registry. The DNS resolves when using nslookup but @Scaine dig, host and nslookup do not use the name service switch (as they don't need to consider other name service mechanisms than DNS). Standard query response 0xb20a No such name PTR 22. A domain trust has been configured and working properly. 0). That's why there're different outcomes. enterprise. If you are not your network’s administrator, notify the administrator that you received this information, which has been recorded in the file C:\WINDOWS\debug\dcdiag. 140. Enabling or Disabling the NetBIOS settings does not appear to help either. g. 50 Server: 192. com (with the 'verbose' option to show responses in dig-like format), you will see that it is actually equivalent to these 3 commands in a row: Pihole is installed on a Raspberry PI A+ that is connected to the network via a usb (gadget mode). If you can't tracert using the IP address which the nslookup returns it would appear that your firewall would be preventing use of ICMP probably at least on network connections which were seen as "Public". Our subnet is 192. Ok, so here's the setup. I understand that Ping and NSLookup do not use the same resolution methods. If I try to ping however, ping server fails with unreachable host. The main issue is that i cant connect to any app. I have a computer on the network win10 pro that is acting as a server for a piece of software. I can ping any other computer on the network by hostname just not this one. From my x86_64 Slackware/Absolute box, I can lookup hosts: $ nslookup pi2w 192. ping server. 78 (google IP) does work, sending and receiving all packets. If you'd like to resolve this, I attached the ipconfig /all and nslooup and ping, full results. Given that pinging the IP but not the domain works, I tried resetting the DNS cache via : sudo dscacheutil -flushcache ; sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder. On my Windows 7 desktop, I have statically-assigned all network values. I can connect to the VPN, and I can join every IP on my remote network. Does anyone have any ideas? The nslookup command works, indicating that the DNS service is reachable and can resolve domain names. Actual Behaviour: No pages can be reached when using a browser. google. 168. 10. This shows the problem with the ping command not working must be due to something else. Changing a couple of settings should help, though, and we're showing you how to do it in this article. Problem started after the creators update, users couldn’t access their mapped drives once connected to the VPN - we shortly found that the client device could nslookup the location fine, but couldn’t ping or access it without a host entry pointing it in the Key notes. Viewed 570 times so naturally i tried pinging it using the hostname but it didn't work, whereas the ip is fine. I can see traffic on our Firewall and nslookup also shows the correct configured dns server. If I We have noticed that sometimes, Windows fails to resolve the domain name when one tries to ping it or do nslookup. . com. I have a user with a new high-end MacBook Pro that can't use the internet. Wireshark shows the DNS query going out but no replies. ping <hostname> fails to resolve tracert <hostname> fails to resolve nslookup <hostname> does resolve but doesn't cache it so that a future ping works. All external hostnames work fine for both ping, ssh, dig or nslookup. Ping fails but nslookup works. company. Fortunately, we can force Windows to do a DNS lookup by using a FQDN (fully qualified domain name). This can be If none of the machines on you LAN can complete a nslookup, then it's likely your local DNS can't resolve the hostname properly. I am going to try to check the You can specify which server to use in nslookup if you want to test using a public DNS server even with proper local-only DNS on the NIC. I have this problem with various hosts on and off, and I can't figure out why. 1). I can tracert the domain and the route comes up nice. Until finally I bumped on this - Windows 7 DNS not working (nslookup IS working; ping -4 name. nslookup can resolve internal host names to their correct IP This is why you're unable to resolve the domain via ping or web browser, but nslookup is fine. dig and nslookup work, but can't ping host. 04 expects . I can connect if I use the FQDN. We have a trust with the new parent company. But I cant ping any domain name I. But all these operations can be done successfully in the VM (outside of the container). However, ping by domain name fails, suggesting a problem with the way DNS queries are being handled or a potential misconfiguration in the search domains or resolv. C:\\Users\\Alexandre>nslookup node1 Serveur : pi. How would my ISP would nslookup can resolve but ping cannot. Try ping wolfman. I can dig and nslookup fqdn too, but cannot ping them: ping: cannot resolve domain. 27 But when I do $ ping pi2w ping: pi2w: Name or service not known So it appears that the Pi is serving names correctly, but resolv. I had a similar issue where it turned out google's public DNS had missing records for a website and my local ISP's DNS was In testing, I have discovered that nslookup ALWAYS works but ping doesn't. nslookup <vm1-ip-address>: Works Ok ping <vm1-ip-address In this container, I can ping external IPs successfully. local. ping 216. He can connect to either our wired or wireless network and do things like browse file shares, but can get no further. I can ping IPs, I can nslookup(and can ping the IPs from it). 27 Address: 192. On my desktop, I can ping a third machine by IP fine. 0. Hi there, i have some problem with my network, let's say. The Problem: Windows clients cannot browse with an active wireguard tunnel. com fails to return anything (nothing printed on screen) nslookup www. 0. local Please check the name and try again. Probably something connected with the fact that the ping command uses libc resolver which honours configuration in the I need some help here. ; For any network trouble, explore our guides in the ping www. Your resolv. ipconfig /flushdns cleared the problem but then it came back and I don't want to be jumping into the command prompt every 5 minutes. I have one DNS server set -- my DNS server. Nslookup from inside network: > nslookup ve4edj. I would say that would be the case however when I ping and use nslookup on the domain it resolves correctly. com". Have now done a network trace on this and seemingly found the following: The first ping request for host1 does For me, I have a local DNS set up with an A record so I can use my DDNS FQDN to access my NAS from both inside and outside my network. The firewall on the wireguard server does not show the queries being blocked. The problem is that I can’t connect by host name to the servers in the trusted domain. If I do nslookup google. com does work, returning correct IP address that then does indeed work with ping. I am VPN'd into a network "DCCorpNet" and wish to complete an nslookup against the enterprises domain "enterprise. local names which don't get resolved via your hosts file, but it did work. 3 Address: xx. What's going on here? Here's what I'm getting on command prompt (domain removed for obvious reasons). Telnet to the DNS server works from other laptops, but not from the laptop that is not working. x/24 and their domain is remote. nslookup google. Sometimes, when trying to run the nslookup command, they encounter this; however That means doing an NSLOOKUP and asking that particular server for the IP address of itself works. 34 Telnet from outside world: Strange network problem. 7 Everything works fine with it. 27#53 Name: pi2w Address: 192. The trust seems to be working, and we have added a DNS suffix for their domain through group policy. The "/etc/resolv. There are older Google results that suggest disabling ipv6 - but there does not appear to be ipv4 in Windows 10. Root cause. ca Address: 24. So if that was the case wouldn't ping and nslookup not work We have noticed that sometimes, Windows fails to resolve the domain name when one tries to ping it or do nslookup. local to be default zone unless it's explicitly specified. a. As to how to solve it — not using separate zone for hosts isn't best (or even good) practice. The full answer is that nslookup does devolution. ping vm1host. It connects directly to a DNS-Server configured in a NIC; Ping uses the internal resolver and so it is aware of NRPT; If you have a This can make things somewhat confusing when diagnosing DNS issues. Ping says it can't find a host, but nslookup resolves it perfectly fine. Only reboot help and sometime dscacheutil -flushcache. com Server: xx. Modified 5 years, 3 months ago. 77. com to get to the website both nslookup on the other hand defaulted to doing an lookup over IPv6, which by the look of things probably isn't configured correctly, hence no reply. When I brought the machine in for testing, I found that I could do an nslookup just fine, and I'm able to ping addresses returned by nslookup just fine. com doesn't work, ping to their IP is fine. local > > Address: 192. 2. However, when I try and do an NSLOOKUP using my ISP DNS servers it fails which would indicate that the records have not been propogated to a "real" external DNS server When I NSlookup from S2 to S1 I get: Note: This information is intended for a network administrator. If I use nslookup everything works like it should: >hawk:~ user$ nslookup publicwebserver. Pinging the FQDN works fine. local). conf is not being examined by ping for name servers. It could be an issue with your DNS server, or NSLookup host1 - works fine and resolves router correctly. All my other devices have the DNS Settings given by the main router via DHCP. conf and replace the hosts: value with this: files dns. To see your connections with their network category you can use PowerShell Get The commands curl and ping also do not work from the workstation. 1. Note that this may not be an ideal solution, since it means you'll be hitting DNS for any . 114 Nom : ping goes through system resolving, meanwhile with dig you're sending requests directly. 26. I can ping external IP addresses (e. nordvpn. What I tried. The remote location’s subnet is 192. Learn more Explore Teams. However, everything is working fine from other machines on the same network (also Linux). local The browser doesn't load any pages, whether they are addressed with IP or hostname. com works. You can use nslookup website dnsip to force nslookup to find the records from a specific DNS. local: Unable to resolve target system name vm1host. I've got a computer having DNS problems with one address only, "microsoftonline. So to explain. domain. I could ping and nslookup in Terminal, but I I can ping LOCALIP but cannot connect to \LOCALIP\SHARENAME. The solution for the first part of this is to use www. dot to the hostname: wolfman. 58. ipconfig /all I can nslookup and dig an internal hostname, and I get a rapid response, but I cannot ping or ssh to the server. Manually adding server with the ip address obtained by nslookup to /etc/hosts makes ping work too, but this "solution" circumvents the nameservers and is thus not ideal (and I would have to add about 20 other entries as well). If you don't need Also check the other computers for their results on nslookup, they could be different. I have confirmed that the systems are getting the new suffix. conf on the command line will give you rationale and overview. apple. None of them can access OWA with the browser. Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams. conf" file shows the intended DNS server first on the list, and Ping to google. arpa But the response to Resolve-DnsName (and ping /a) came from NBSTAT query in NBNS (NetBIOS Name Service) protocol. com . E www. For any other software-related problems, you will find expert solutions in the Troubleshooting Hub. I have tried it with two different PC's, an iPad, a HTC One and an iPhone. google. txt. I think it comes from my mac, because the "ping fqdn" did work, and then stop. There are two DNS Search suffix's (domain1. I probably tried everything I could find in the net - nothing helped. dns, question . If I use nslookup (ip address) I get a response with Strange thing is that I can ping the domain with no losses. Here’s the breakdown: Our site is connected to another site via fiber connection. Recently the client computer stopped communicating with the server I can ping the servers IP but cannot ping it by hostname. Therefore, nslookup -q=all host. 254 > >Address: 192. 50 Address: 192. I am physically connected to the contoso. com becomes nslookup -q=all host. NSLookup may show the correct DNS server but it won’t show you the routing data data and the route that the traffic tries follow back to that IP. I have a DNS server set up on one of my machines using BIND 9. 185. If I ping that IP, i get responses, but if i ping the local domain, it does not work. xx. In practice, we do this by suffixing a . Hi Having a bit of an issue with Windows 10 and VPN connections at multiple locations we look after. 243) and if I get in the terminal and do a nslookup it finds the ldap server just fine. 27 Server: 192. When the nslookup command works but ping fails on your device, the causes can be multiple. com LAN and I recently installed this OS and this behavior started. conf file is a mess – yet, nslookup and host which both do use exactly this file do manage to resolve single-label domain name just fine. tracert <ip> resolve and gives the fully qualified hostname No firewall issues or any security software that's unusual to this machine. ca 192. local: Unknown host I have make searches on Internet but cannot find a solution. If the telnet test to port 53 connects, then nslookup should work. I can also nslookup the domain and I get all the correct information. Sometimes the websites don’t resolve If nslookup works but ping fails, it means that your computer can resolve the domain name to an IP address, but it cannot connect to the server at that address. The final step is to force Windows to append this dot itself. com NOT working) I tried to set the hostname before, it was probably the 1st thing I tried, but it did not help. 1 The local IP is my local PiHole, which I mainly use as a local DNS Server. conf within the pods. The reason is that Here’s another strange thingI can use nslookup for IPs for serversand it works finehowever, for PC IPs, nslookup fails troypacnw (Troy_PacNW) August 8, 2013, 4:49pm Sorry for the long title. ) After a strange glitch with a DNS-server on our network, the ping command returns "Unknown Host," but the dig (or nslookup) commands promptly produce a NOERROR response from the server. DNS settings are coming from the ISP, and work fine on other laptops, replacing them with public DNS server settings doesn't help. dnsserver1. I am pretty sure that I have the DNS set up OK as the nslookup is OK but I can't ping and I can't access webpages at weddinglist. 209. ' at the end of your hostname to suppress devolution. 254#53 > >Name: publicwebserver. Pinging by host name only fails, though I can ping by FQDN. Pinging the IP works fine. ping google. 229. com, it will tell me can't resolve 'google. After examining output of wireshark while using Resolve-DnsName, I saw that indeed those IPs didn't have PTR records in DNS:. Expected Behaviour: Be able to nslookup a local DNS using Pihole as DNS, and be able to see an HTTP server and ping the machine Actual Behaviour: Lookup is working and is giving the correct IP. Ask Question Asked 5 years, 3 months ago. uuyxh kopjwmc cqwxuxcw jqv dav ytmr dozxd ghqhjk ktg iaik